The trinity of Citizenship (Amendment) Act, National Population Register

The trinity of  Citizenship (Amendment) Act,  National Population Register  - National Register of Citizens continues to elicit Powerfully editorial response. Munsifs editorial on 5 March has a query as its title: Is this also a ruse by the hostility? It speaks of the US’s Freedom of Religion Commission and point out that many countries have criticized the laws that discriminate against the Muslims, It also says that many countries have articulated concern over the violence in Delhi  the latest being Iran after that to whom the Indian govt.has slap out. The paper speaks of the UN Human Rights Commissioner’s statement and talks of the option of India attracting like criticism from another residence.

The Urdu Times on 1 March  has an editorial which cites a Right to Information application about Prime Minister Narendra  Modi’s citizenship. Related to the paper. The project management office has made it clear that Prime Minister Modi has no verification of his citizenship because he is an occupant by birth as per Section 3 of the nationality Act 1955. The editorial says that Mr. Amit Shah accuses the resistance of fomenting problem, but asks if Indians are so stupid as to get instigate on giving up peace (sukoon) and objection on the streets for months?” The editorial concludes by saying “it is the task of each national to save the establishment.

Siasat on March 1 speaks of No   National Population Register in Telangana. The paper's leader says that the of  Citizenship (Amendment) Act,  National Population Register  - National Register of Citizens have created a sense of restlessness.. protests against the law by a section of people should be a cause for concern. But Prime Minister Modi has done nothing to assure people and reduce the climate of hate. The paper believes that SC should have either strike this law down or stayed it but it has given the Centre respite by asking for a reply If the Court plays by the organization, there is an option of nation getting some interval.

US-Taliban detente

Avadhnama editorial on 3 March  on the US-Taliban pact describes the contract as a sign of “new hope.” It says that permanent peace is in the region would be a blessing for its public &for a nation which for so long has been full of hostility. It also avers that the quiet in Afghanistan would be a blessing for India, which is involved in several developmental projects in the area.

Munsif  editorial on 3 March  says it is now incumbent on the people of Afghanistan to arrive at a concord more how the nation is governed.the main players in the country must resolve their differences. Otherwise, the country would be the biggest loser. It contends that the next fortnight will be very essential because there will be deliberations on the constitution of Afghanistan.”

Delhi violence

Inquilab on 29 February has a well-built editorial: ‘Gujarat model or the Delhi model?’ It says life has started coming back on the tracks in Delhi. But the wounds inflicted by 3 days of shock will get time to cure. It is high-quality that the LG appears interested in restore peace and amity. This is amazing the management should have done formerly. The paper criticizes the unification house parson for not visiting the fighting slap position. No riot can last past 24 hours if the police and the management don’t want it to, the editorial contends. The paper has another editorial on10 March  asking for “a fair query into the Delhi riots.”

Etemaad’s editorial on 2 March is titled In the name of peace, rousing violence. BJP  have problem provocative statement against quiet protestors. These include Union minister Anurag Thakur and the UP Chief Minister Mr.Yogi Adityanath. The editorial points out that more than 40 people died in the riot Mishra, in the name of a peace march made another bid to damage peace.

Music editorial on March 4 asks, Why double standards? It speaks of the “best way to install confidence” amongst those who were attacked and lost their houses “would be to take action against those accountable, build a strong case against them and ensure that they are punished. But it is sad that instead, the police are protecting those elements”. The earth knows how the BJP influential, Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma, Kapil Mishra, Anurag Thakur vitiated the mood during the Delhi Assembly politics .there is in the sequence that the law has bigger the precautions of Kapil Mishra. What is the memo that is being given to Delhi? The paper writes that while it is better that action is being taken next to the Aam Aadmi Party  MLA why has there no action beside the BJP leaders? There is no require to seem for proof against them either, as videos of their hate-filled speeches are in the public domain..but the Delhi police are trying to scheme them as heroes a condemnable act.